Macabre Media ~ Häxan: Witchcraft Through the Ages (1922)

Title Card: Centuries have passed and the Almighty of medieval times no longer sits in his tenth sphere.
Title Card: But isn’t superstition still rampant among us?
Title Card: And the little woman, whom we call hysterical, alone and unhappy, isn’t she still a riddle for us?

Click image for IMDb's summary, complete synopsis, interesting trivia, etc.

I spent most of this snowy day sorting all of our books in preparation for moving. This was no small task. Upon figuring out how many bookshelves will fit into the new apartment, we realized we had to ruthlessly cull our collection. Of course we want to take along as many as we can, so I needed to physically move great stacks of books from downstairs to upstairs and vice versa – just to find out which groups of books would fit best on which shelves. You see, the shelves that are currently bolted to the walls upstairs will go in the new livingroom, and the shelves that are downstairs will be in our bedrooms. Obviously then, I decided, my cookbooks (31) had to go up and my writing books (79) had to go down – to cite two examples.

Those parenthetical numbers, by the way, are just the books that survived the cull. You don’t want to know how many “groups” we have, and you certainly don’t want to know how many books are in each of those groups. As for me, I don’t want to think about how many of my beloved volumes are now in bags, waiting to go to Half-Price Books when the roads get better.

But I’m supposed to be writing about Häxan: Witchcraft Through the Ages, aren’t I? There is a connection: I was only able to settle in with a silent movie this evening because I was physically tired from lugging books around. Usually, I knit when I watch TV, but I have a tendency to stare at my hands rather than the screen, which makes title cards problematical. In fact, I have attempted Häxan before, but was not able to concentrate enough to really follow the story that the filmmaker, Benjamin Christensen, was trying to tell.

Tonight, I was able to stay with him. In the process, I was reminded I should set aside my handwork more often, because I do relish the experience of being transported to the early days of filmmaking. My enjoyment was enhanced, I think, by my recent viewing of the 2011 movie, Hugo – which helped me understand the art and craft that went into the films of Georges Méliès – an early and prolific film maker who basically invented special effects at the turn of the century.

Yeah, Georges Méliès is the guy that made THAT film.

Häxan – which was made twenty years later – had plenty of special effects, and I was surprised I found them effective, despite my jaded 21st-century sensibilities. The structure of the film was unusual – I’ve not seen the like before, even in other silent films. It’s a cross between a documentary and a dramatic story, presented in seven sections. One thing that struck me was the appearance of the decidedly non-glamorous actors. We are not used to seeing people who look this … real on a screen. No special effect makeup was required to make these actors look appropriate to the roles of medieval peasantry – I believe the toothless monk really was toothless. Apparently, the movie was quite shocking, in its day, due to scenes of torture and brief nudity. (These are very tame compared to today’s movies.)

The most fascinating section of this silent film comes in the seventh and final act, when the filmmaker, Benjamin Christensen, compares superstitious, middle-age practices and beliefs to those of modern times. Of course, the progressive and compassionate ideas of Christensen’s time strike the 21st-century eye as simplistic and sexist. It makes me wonder how people of the future will perceive the way we currently deal with mental illness.

WriMoProg: 12 + 64 = 76/200

About these ads

3 Comments on “Macabre Media ~ Häxan: Witchcraft Through the Ages (1922)”

  1. Despite all the imagery and story about marriage with the devil and witchcraft, the scariest part of the film is when, in documentary form, the film goes into its definition of the hysterical modern woman and how best to deal with such hysteria. It is a fascinting film, nevertheless.

    • Michael ~ Hello! Thanks for stopping by. I checked out your blog, and am looking forward to exploring it further, once I’ve settled into my new home later this month. I must agree with you on your assessment of the treatment of hysteria. I’m sort of surprised at how this film is sticking with me. That’s partially due, I think, to my recurring wish for a longer, better look at that clockwork model of hell that is featured.

      I just went to look for your name, so I could address this properly. Now I must squee at you: PLEASEpleaseplease consider sending along or posting a photo or photos of the Amityville house that I could share here! I am always looking for originals I can credit to the actual photographer.

  2. You know, living in close proximity to Amityville (3 towns away – aprox 8 miles) I never thought to take a photo. It is an afluent neighborhood now, police and current owners do not take kindly to anyone stopping to gawk or take photos. The house has been completely changed and they got rid of those curved attic windows. The town has changed all the numeration on the street to confuse people as to which house it is. By the time you figure it out, the police are there giving you a ticket for loitering.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 370 other followers